On 01/17/2019 11:02 AM, Quentin Monnet wrote: > 2019-01-16 16:28 UTC-0800 ~ Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicin...@netronome.com> >> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:21:11 +0000, Quentin Monnet wrote: >>> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> +tool for inspection of eBPF-related parameters for Linux kernel or net >>> device >>> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Slight preference for s/eBPF/BPF/, the system call and /proc/ stuff is >> all called bpf, not ebpf. >> >> Also a question/nit here: >> >> Does the rst2man tool care about the marking vs text length, here >> dashes are longer than the actual text, people are fixing such >> occurrences for Sphinx, I wonder if we should care? > > I'd rather keep it unchanged in this patch, as it is aligned with what other > bpftool man pages do: bpftool, bpftool-cgroup, bpftool-map and bpftool-prog > all have “eBPF” (bpftool-perf and bpftool-net have “bpf”, lower case) in > their description. And all pages have longer dash rules, which rst2man does > not seem to mind about. > > I can fix all this for all bpftool pages in a follow-up patch, though, if > it's alright for you?
My preference is on for s/eBPF/BPF/ as well, so lets fix everything up; follow-up is okay with me. Thanks, Daniel
