On 12/6/06, Ivo van Doorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2 - Hardware key that does not control the hardware radio and does not report anything to userspace > > Kind of uninteresting button ;) And this is the button that rfkill was originally designed for. Laptops with integrated WiFi cards from Ralink have a hardware button that don't send anything to userspace (unless the ACPI event is read) and does not directly control the radio itself.
So what does such a button do? I am confused here... ...
And this event should be reported by a generic approach right? So it should be similar as with your point 2 below. But this would mean that the driver should create the input device. Or can a driver send the KEY_WIFI event over a main layer without the need of a personal input device? I am not that familiar with the input device layer in the kernel, and this is my first attempt on creating something for it, so I might have missed something. ;)
Yes, I think the driver should just create an input device. You may provide a generic implementation for a polled button and have driver instantiate it but I do not think that a single RFkill button device is needed - you won't have too many of them in a single system anyway (I think you will normally have 1, 2 at the most). ...
> 3. A device without transmitter but with a button - just register with > input core. Userspace will have to manage state of other devices with > transmitters in response to button presses. This is clear too. Rfkill is only intended for drivers that control a device with a transmitter (WiFi, Bluetooth, IRDA) that have a button that is intended to do something with the radio/transmitter. > Does this make sense? Yes, this was what I intended to do with rfkill, so at that point we have the same goal.
I think it is almost the same. I also want support RF devices that can control radio state but lack a button. This is covered by mixing 2) and 3) in kernel and for userspace looks exactly like 2) with a button. ...
> > I don't think a config option is a good idea unless by config option > you mean a sysfs attribute. I indeed meant a sysfs attribute. I should have been more clear on this. :)
OK :) -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html