On 01/10/2019 02:22 PM, Florian Westphal wrote: > Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com> wrote: >> I couldn't find any mention of the advisory in the commit logs or >> netdev discussion, and apparently there's no protocol requirement that >> intermediate fragements need to be at least minimal MTU. Maybe this >> patch should be reverted? > > Currently ipv6 reasm doesn't use rbtree infrastructure, so it would > have to be converted first. > <quote> Section 4.5 of RFC 8200 allows for sending any fragment for fragments as long they add up to the original packet. </quote> I do not believe we need an rbtree to implement this idea.
- Re: [PATCH v3 23/30] ipv6: defrag: drop non-last frags sm... Tom Herbert
- Re: [PATCH v3 23/30] ipv6: defrag: drop non-last fra... Florian Westphal
- Re: [PATCH v3 23/30] ipv6: defrag: drop non-last... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH v3 23/30] ipv6: defrag: drop non-... Michal Kubecek
- Re: [PATCH v3 23/30] ipv6: defrag: drop ... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH v3 23/30] ipv6: defrag: ... Michal Kubecek
- Re: [PATCH v3 23/30] ipv6: defr... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH v3 23/30] ipv6: ... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH v3 23/30] ipv6: ... Michal Kubecek
- Re: [PATCH v3 23/30] ipv6: ... Peter Oskolkov
- Re: [PATCH v3 23/30] ipv6: ... Michal Kubecek
- Re: [PATCH v3 23/30] ipv6: ... Tom Herbert