Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2006 10:13 schrieb Thomas Graf: > I do not agree with the change to include if_addr.h in rtnetlink.h. > The point is to move bits apart and have multiple small pieces > of header files defining a specific rtnetlink family which are a > lot easier to maintain for both kernel and userspace than one giant > rtnetlink.h for everything.
According to a user's report, your change also broke compilation of my dhcpclient because it neeeds if_addr.h since 2.6.19. Any suggestion how to make one source code build on 2.6.19 and older headers? I hope you don't want me to check on UTS_RELEASE in a userspace program? Stefan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
