On 01.01.2019 09:42, Murali Krishna Policharla wrote: > Store newly configured mtu settings in the netdevice after mtu > configuration is successful to the dsa switch. > > Fixes: 2315dc91a5 ("net: make dev_set_mtu() honor notification return code") > Signed-off-by: Murali Krishna Policharla <murali.policha...@broadcom.com> > Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.faine...@broadcom.com> > --- > net/core/dev.c | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c > index 722d50d..58617aa 100644 > --- a/net/core/dev.c > +++ b/net/core/dev.c > @@ -7586,12 +7586,15 @@ int dev_change_flags(struct net_device *dev, unsigned > int flags) > int __dev_set_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu) > { > const struct net_device_ops *ops = dev->netdev_ops; > + int ret = 0; > > if (ops->ndo_change_mtu) > - return ops->ndo_change_mtu(dev, new_mtu);
Is there a .ndo_change_mtu callback, which does not assign a new mtu itself? > + ret = ops->ndo_change_mtu(dev, new_mtu); > > - dev->mtu = new_mtu; > - return 0; > + if (ret >= 0) > + dev->mtu = new_mtu; > + > + return ret; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__dev_set_mtu); > >