On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 18:27 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 09:14:36AM -0600, Steve Wise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > Chelsio doesn't implement TCP stack in the driver. Just like Ammasso, > > it sends messages to the HW to setup connections. It differs from > > Ammasso in at least 2 ways: > > > > 1) Ammasso does the MPA negotiations in FW/HW. Chelsio does it in the > > RDMA driver. So there is code in the Chelsio driver to handle MPA > > startup negotiation (the exchange of 2 packets over the TCP connection > > while its still in streaming more). BTW: This code _could_ be moved > > into the core IWCM if we find it could be used by other rnic devices > > (don't know yet). > > > > 2) Ammasso implments a 100% deep adapter. It does ARP, routing, IP, > > TCP, and IWARP protocols all in firmware/hw. It had 2 mac addresses > > simulating 2 ethernet ports. One exclusively for RDMA connections, and > > one for host stack traffic. Chelsio implements a shallower adapter that > > only does TCP in HW. ARP, for instance, is handled by the native stack > > and the rdma driver uses netevents to maintain arp tables in the HW for > > use by the offloaded TCP connections. > > So breifly saying - there is TCP stack implementation (including ARP and > routing and other parts) in hardware/firmware/driver which is guaranteed > to not be visible to host other than in form of high-level dataflow. > Am I right here?
For Ammasso, yes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
