On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 8:16 AM Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 4:25 PM Willem de Bruijn
> <willemdebruijn.ker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 3:30 PM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.ker...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > @@ -851,39 +890,7 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level,
> > > int optname,
> > > break;
> > >
> > > case SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD:
> > > - if (val & ~SOF_TIMESTAMPING_MASK) {
> > > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > > - break;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - if (val & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID &&
> > > - !(sk->sk_tsflags & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_ID)) {
> > > - if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP &&
> > > - sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM) {
> > > - if ((1 << sk->sk_state) &
> > > - (TCPF_CLOSE | TCPF_LISTEN)) {
> > > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > > - break;
> > > - }
> > > - sk->sk_tskey = tcp_sk(sk)->snd_una;
> > > - } else {
> > > - sk->sk_tskey = 0;
> > > - }
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - if (val & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_STATS &&
> > > - !(val & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TSONLY)) {
> > > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > > - break;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - sk->sk_tsflags = val;
> > > - if (val & SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE)
> > > - sock_enable_timestamp(sk,
> > > -
> > > SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE);
> > > - else
> > > - sock_disable_timestamp(sk,
> > > - (1UL <<
> > > SOCK_TIMESTAMPING_RX_SOFTWARE));
> > > + ret = setsockopt_timestamping(sk, optname, val);
> >
> > Once again a lot of needless code churn. The only functional change is
> > adding
>
> I think moving the code out into a separate function is a useful cleanup,
> but if we want to do that, it may be better done in another patch, to
> make it easier to review.
I already removed this addition of function. I have open coded all the
logic here and in the patch 6.
I will post an update.
-Deepa
