NAME_DISTRIBUTOR messages are transmitted through unicast link on TIPC
2.0, by contrast, the messages are delivered through broadcast link on
TIPC 1.7. But at present, NAME_DISTRIBUTOR messages received by
broadcast link cannot be handled in tipc_rcv() until an unicast message
arrives, which may lead to a significant delay to update name table.

To avoid this delay, we will also deal with broadcast NAME_DISTRIBUTOR
message on broadcast receive path.

Signed-off-by: Zhenbo Gao <zhenbo....@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying....@windriver.com>
---
 net/tipc/node.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/tipc/node.c b/net/tipc/node.c
index 32556f4..5980abb 100644
--- a/net/tipc/node.c
+++ b/net/tipc/node.c
@@ -1549,6 +1549,10 @@ static void tipc_node_bc_rcv(struct net *net, struct 
sk_buff *skb, int bearer_id
        if (!skb_queue_empty(&be->inputq1))
                tipc_node_mcast_rcv(n);
 
+       /* Handle NAME_DISTRIBUTOR messages sent from 1.7 nodes */
+       if (!skb_queue_empty(&n->bc_entry.namedq))
+               tipc_named_rcv(net, &n->bc_entry.namedq);
+
        /* If reassembly or retransmission failure => reset all links to peer */
        if (rc & TIPC_LINK_DOWN_EVT)
                tipc_node_reset_links(n);
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to