NAME_DISTRIBUTOR messages are transmitted through unicast link on TIPC 2.0, by contrast, the messages are delivered through broadcast link on TIPC 1.7. But at present, NAME_DISTRIBUTOR messages received by broadcast link cannot be handled in tipc_rcv() until an unicast message arrives, which may lead to a significant delay to update name table.
To avoid this delay, we will also deal with broadcast NAME_DISTRIBUTOR message on broadcast receive path. Signed-off-by: Zhenbo Gao <zhenbo....@windriver.com> Reviewed-by: Ying Xue <ying....@windriver.com> --- net/tipc/node.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/tipc/node.c b/net/tipc/node.c index 32556f4..5980abb 100644 --- a/net/tipc/node.c +++ b/net/tipc/node.c @@ -1549,6 +1549,10 @@ static void tipc_node_bc_rcv(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, int bearer_id if (!skb_queue_empty(&be->inputq1)) tipc_node_mcast_rcv(n); + /* Handle NAME_DISTRIBUTOR messages sent from 1.7 nodes */ + if (!skb_queue_empty(&n->bc_entry.namedq)) + tipc_named_rcv(net, &n->bc_entry.namedq); + /* If reassembly or retransmission failure => reset all links to peer */ if (rc & TIPC_LINK_DOWN_EVT) tipc_node_reset_links(n); -- 1.9.1