Dmitry Mishin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:00, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Ok. Just a quick summary of where I see the discussion. >> >> We all agree that L2 isolation is needed at some point. > As we all agreed on this, may be it is time to send patches one-by-one? > For the beggining, I propose to resend Cedric's empty namespace patch as base > for others - it is really empty, but necessary in order to move further. > > After this patch and the following net namespace unshare patch will be > accepted, I could send network devices virtualization patches for review and > discussion. > > What do you think?
I think sending out these patches for review sounds great. For merge order I think enabling the unshare/clone flags to anyone but developers should be about the last thing we do. Starting with clone/unshare sounds to me like hitching up the cart before it is built. I really need to focus on finishing up the pid namespace, so except for a little review and conversation I'm not going to help much on the network side. Of course I need to mess with unix domain sockets to properly implement the pid namespace. Because of the pid credential passing. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
