On Mon, 2006-04-12 at 14:57 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > I think the complications come from the fact that you remeber two > policies, but only one seems necessary. How about this (completely > untested) patch? It simply uses increasing sequence numbers for all > but the last entry and uses zero for the last one. >
I could give this a try in about 2 hours. But why dont you like the callback approach? You have to admit, this is hairy code. > And the same for SAs. > The SA has less things to remember, so it is easier; but i will apply this and test it and if it meets the requirements I will look into converting the SA to the same scheme. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
