On Wednesday 29 November 2006 16:58, Michael Renzmann wrote: > Hi. > > > On Wednesday 29 November 2006 16:24, David Kimdon wrote: > >> There is absolutely no reason why dadwifi can't be merged into the > >> mainline once the hal issue is resolved. > > Last time we talked about that stuff, it was decided that > > we don't want a HAL... See archives. > > IIRC Pavel already explained that getting rid of the HAL per se should be > no problem - it could easily be dissolved into the driver, if that is one > of the requirements to be fulfilled before the driver (MadWifi or DadWifi) > is considered for mainline inclusion. As soon as there is source available > to dissolve, at least.
Ok, so who actually does the work? It has been talked a lot about what could and what should be done. But who does it? > From what I understood the "... once the hal issue is resolved" part of > David's mail refered to exactly that question. Ok, I don't know what "The HAL Issue" (tm) is. Sounds like a hollywood movie theme to me. ;) -- Greetings Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
