On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 08:55 -0800, David Kimdon wrote: > ok. I am concerned that making this split between per driver and per > card is difficult to get right. Setting or not setting a function > pointer for an operation is fairly standard practice and I don't see > the value in introducing yet another way to indicate support.
I guess we can punt this patch until some driver shows up that actually has some cards that need the function and some that don't. I'm actually guessing such a driver won't exist but wanted this for completeness in the split between _wiphy and _ops. johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
