On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:55:18PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > I wonder if it's an option to use low priority QoS fields for these acks > (heck I don't even know if ACKs have such fields in their packet) so > that they can get dropped if there are more packets then there is > bandwidth ....
Is it proven that the number of ACKs actually cause bandwidth problems? I found Volanomark to exercise the scheduler more than anything else, so maybe the slowdown, while triggered by an increased number of ACKs, is caused by something else entirely. Olaf -- Walks like a duck. Quacks like a duck. Must be a chicken. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
