On Thu 2018-12-06 12:23:33, David Miller wrote:
> From: Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz>
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 14:03:45 +0100
> 
> > @@ -79,7 +82,7 @@ static enum dsa_tag_protocol 
> > mv88e6060_get_tag_protocol(struct dsa_switch *ds,
> >  {
> >    //return DSA_TAG_PROTO_QCA;
> >    //return DSA_TAG_PROTO_TRAILER;
> 
> These C++ style comments are not in any of my tree(s).
> 
> Your patch submission really needs to shape up if you want your patches
> to be considered seriously.

This one should have been "RFD". It has way more serious problems then
this, as changelog tried to explain.

                                                                        Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) 
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to