On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:31 AM Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> In some scenarios, the GRO engine can assemble an UDP GRO packet
> that ultimately lands on a non GRO-enabled socket.
> This patch tries to address the issue explicitly checking for the UDP
> socket features before enqueuing the packet, and eventually segmenting
> the unexpected GRO packet, as needed.
>
> We must also cope with re-insertion requests: after segmentation the
> UDP code calls the helper introduced by the previous patches, as needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pab...@redhat.com>
> ---
> +static inline struct sk_buff *udp_rcv_segment(struct sock *sk,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *segs;
> +
> + /* the GSO CB lays after the UDP one, no need to save and restore any
> + * CB fragment, just initialize it
> + */
> + segs = __skb_gso_segment(skb, NETIF_F_SG, false);
> + if (unlikely(IS_ERR(segs)))
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + else if (segs)
> + consume_skb(skb);
> + return segs;
> +}
> +
> +
> +void ip_protocol_deliver_rcu(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, int
> proto);
> +
> +static int udp_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *next, *segs;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (likely(!udp_unexpected_gso(sk, skb)))
> + return udp_queue_rcv_one_skb(sk, skb);
> +
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct udp_skb_cb) > SKB_SGO_CB_OFFSET);
> + __skb_push(skb, -skb_mac_offset(skb));
> + segs = udp_rcv_segment(sk, skb);
> + for (skb = segs; skb; skb = next) {
need to check IS_ERR(segs) again?
