On Wed, 2018-10-17 at 22:35 -0700, Cong Wang wrote: > > (well, after some more thinking I looked again at that patch and yes, it > > lacked the most important thing:) > > Hmm, as I said, I am not sure if the logic is correct, if we have two > different > goto actions, we must have two pointers. > > I will re-think about it tomorrow. (I am at a conference so don't have much > time on reviewing this.) > > Thanks.
sure, ok. In the meanwhile, I will post a V2 that: - adds the missing test that avoids having 'goto action' in the primary and in the fallback control action at the same time - fixes a very silly bug that made it fail the TDC 'gact' selftest regards, -- davide
