Hagen Paul Pfeifer wrote:
* John Heffner | 2006-10-26 13:29:26 [-0400]:
My reservation in doing this would be that as an administrator, I may
want to choose exactly what congestion control is available any any
given time. The different congestion control algorithms are not
necessarily fair to each other.
ACK, completely right. A user without CAP_NET_ADMIN MUST NOT changed the
algorithm. We know that there are some unfairness out there. And maybe some
time ago someone introduce a satellite-algorithm which is per definition
completely unfair to vanilla tcp.
We should guard this with a CAP_NET_ADMIN capability so that built-in modules
also shouldn't be enabled.
I don't know if I'd want to go that far. For example, there's a nice
protocol TCP-LP which is by design unfair in the other direction -- it
yields to other traffic so that you can basically run a scavenger service.
If you really care about this, you could try to rank protocols based on
aggressiveness (note this is not trivial) and do something like 'nice'
where mortals can only nice up not down. Practically speaking, I'm not
sure this is necessary (worth the effort).
-John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
