> > I don't understand why you are doing this? It is not going to be > faster (or safer) than container_of. container_of provides the > same functionality and is safe against position of the member > in the structure. >
In fact, most places are converting dst to rt6_info directly, and only few place uses container_of net/ipv6/ip6_output.c: struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info *)skb_dst(skb); net/ipv6/route.c: const struct rt6_info *rt = (struct rt6_info *)dst; -Li