On 9/27/18 3:36 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 2:16 PM Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 09/27/2018 01:42 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> It is clearly a copy-n-paste.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> net/sched/cls_api.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>> index 3de47e99b788..8dd7f8af6d54 100644
>>> --- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>> +++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>>> @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ static struct tcf_block *tcf_block_find(struct net
>>> *net, struct Qdisc **q,
>>>
>>> *q = qdisc_refcount_inc_nz(*q);
>>> if (!*q) {
>>> - NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Parent Qdisc doesn't exists");
>>> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Can't increase Qdisc
>>> refcount");
>>
>>
>> I am not sure it was a copy-n-paste.
>
>
> Make sure you knew there is an exactly same extack message
> (with a same English grammar error).
>
>
>>
>> Qdisc refcount business is kernel internal.
>
> Yeah, but the extack message is already there, this patch doesn't add
> any new extack. Or you are suggesting we should remove it?
IMO the message grammar should be fixed, but the content is correct --
ie, parent qdisc does not exist.
