On 09/25/2018 10:42 PM, Harini Katakam wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:00 PM Harini Katakam <hari...@xilinx.com> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:10 PM Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote:
I hope this this thread isn't too old to bring back to life. So it seems
that Harini found that m88e1111 did not need this errata, and Cisco
previously found that Harini's patch fixed m88e1112, we included it
internally for that reason
Now I'm getting reports that this errata fixes issues we're seeing on
m88e1111. We see an interrupt storm without the errata, despite the errata
not being defined in the datasheet.
Is everybody actually using interrupts? It could be in one system
phylib is polling.
Yes, we weren't using interrupts; we used phy poll.
As I recall, the register and page combination was reserved and
the access seemed to fail.
It will be useful if we can the errata description or version details.
I'll check if I can get any more information.
One of the PHY parts used was "88E1111-B2-bab1i000"
I doubt I can find this level of detail .. We have many of these
machines in the field so they may have different part numbers.
I may have been given some incorrect details on the issue. I'm not
currently sure this errata code is related. I'll let you know when I
have more information.
Daniel
