On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:38:14 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 15:22:39 +0200 > > > [<c010469d>] dump_stack+0x12/0x14 > > [<c0141cb3>] softlockup_tick+0xaa/0xc1 > > [<c0129bad>] update_process_times+0x3b/0x5e > > [<c01362a1>] handle_update_profile+0x14/0x1e > > [<c0115956>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x49/0x5b > > [<c0103998>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x28/0x30 > > DWARF2 unwinder stuck at apic_timer_interrupt+0x28/0x30 > > Leftover inexact backtrace: > > [<c01d03af>] delay_tsc+0xb/0x13 > > [<c01d03e0>] __delay+0x6/0x7 > > It's OOPS'ing by softlockup'ing in udelay() and then we get a corrupt > backtrace. The unwinder-based backtrace is screwed up (yet again) but the old-style backtrace is there, in all its messy glory. Weeding out the crap, I think it's this: [<c01d03af>] delay_tsc+0xb/0x13 [<c01d03e0>] __delay+0x6/0x7 [<c022c240>] _tw32_flush+0x3f/0x51 [<c022da97>] tg3_switch_clocks+0x8f/0x93 <I assume tg3_init_hw() got inlined> [<c0237673>] tg3_open+0x250/0x520 [<c02d3263>] dev_open+0x2b/0x62 [<c02d1dd8>] dev_change_flags+0x47/0xe4 [<c0307fcc>] devinet_ioctl+0x252/0x556 [<c02d2e5a>] dev_ifsioc+0x113/0x38d [<c02d29c4>] dev_load+0x24/0x4b [<c02c9265>] sock_ioctl+0x19e/0x1c2 It's strange that the post-2.6.19-rc2 changes triggered this - that code won't have run yet. Norbert, are you really sure? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html