On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 13:59:39 -0400
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.ker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
> index e5d236595206..8cb8e02c8ab6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
> @@ -572,6 +572,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *vxlan_gro_receive(struct sock *sk,
> struct list_head *head,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> + const struct net_offload *ops;
> struct sk_buff *pp = NULL;
> struct sk_buff *p;
> struct vxlanhdr *vh, *vh2;
> @@ -606,6 +607,12 @@ static struct sk_buff *vxlan_gro_receive(struct sock *sk,
> goto out;
> }
>
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + ops = net_gro_receive(dev_offloads, ETH_P_TEB);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + if (!ops)
> + goto out;
Isn't rcu_read_lock already held here?
RCU read lock is always held in the receive handler path
> +
> skb_gro_pull(skb, sizeof(struct vxlanhdr)); /* pull vxlan header */
>
> list_for_each_entry(p, head, list) {
> @@ -621,6 +628,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *vxlan_gro_receive(struct sock *sk,
> }
>
> pp = call_gro_receive(eth_gro_receive, head, skb);
> +
> flush = 0;
whitespace change crept into this patch.
