Hi Stephen,

>>> The name value from SET_NETDEV_DEVTYPE only ended up in the uevent sysfs
>>> file as DEVTYPE= information. To avoid any kind of race conditions
>>> between netlink messages and reading from sysfs, it is useful to add the
>>> same string as new IFLA_DEVTYPE attribute included in the RTM_NEWLINK
>>> messages.
>>> 
>>> For network managing daemons that have to classify ARPHRD_ETHER network
>>> devices into different types (like Wireless LAN, Bluetooth etc.), this
>>> avoids the extra round trip to sysfs and parsing of the uevent file.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <mar...@holtmann.org>
>>> ---
>>> include/uapi/linux/if_link.h |  2 ++
>>> net/core/rtnetlink.c         | 12 ++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
>>> index 43391e2d1153..781294972bb4 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
>>> @@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ enum {
>>>     IFLA_NEW_IFINDEX,
>>>     IFLA_MIN_MTU,
>>>     IFLA_MAX_MTU,
>>> +   IFLA_DEVTYPE,           /* Name value from SET_NETDEV_DEVTYPE */  
>> 
>> This is not something netdev-related. dev->dev.type is struct device_type.
>> This is a generic "device" thing. Incorrect to expose over
>> netdev-specific API. Please use "device" API for this.
> 
> There is no device API in netlink. The whole point of this patch is to
> do it in one message. It might be a performance optimization, but I can't
> see how it could be a race condition. Devices set type before registering.

the only way right now to pick up the DEVTYPE= value is from the 
/sys/class/net/*/uevent file. That is based on the ifname and not the index. 
When udev + systemd start renaming things behind your back, your daemon does 
not have a clean one-shot way of getting that information. As stated, the 
information in DEVTYPE= are a sub-classification of ARPHRD_ETHER and allows to 
differentiate a wired Ethernet card from a WiFi interface, from a Bluetooth 
interface, from WiMAX and so on. They just happen to be in dev.dev_type data 
structure at the moment and I didn't want to duplicate that information.

I am actually fine doing this via IFLA_INFO_KIND since NetworkManager seems to 
be fixed now or do this via a different method or maybe just a different 
attribute name. I really just want to get the sub-classification of 
ARPHRD_ETHER that we need in userspace networking daemons from the kernel 
without having to go poke left and right over sysfs or interact with udev or 
systemd.

Regards

Marcel

Reply via email to