On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 15:34 +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > Current WE implementation of rate limiting (SIOCSIWRATE) doesn't make > much sense with d80211.
Right. > Hopefully we'll invent a better solution for > cfg80211. We could do it right here and now then. I haven't understood the matter though, may I delegate it to you (plural "you" intended here) > Then we will probably need to put some constraints on > SIOCSIWRATE emulation (like "rate limiting is lost when you are > disassociated") - hence the comment. That's ok. johannes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
