On 8/15/18 10:39 AM, Phil Sutter wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:24:31AM -0600, David Ahern wrote: >> On 8/15/18 10:21 AM, Phil Sutter wrote: >>> Add an additional prerequisite to check_enable_color() to make sure >>> stdout actually points to an open TTY device. Otherwise calls like >>> >>> | ip -color a s >/tmp/foo >>> >>> will print color escape sequences into that file. Allow to override this >>> check by specifying '-color' flag more than once. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <p...@nwl.cc> >>> --- >>> Changes since v1: >>> - Allow to override isatty() check by specifying '-color' flag more than >>> once. >> >> That adds overhead to my workflow where I almost always have to pipe the >> output of ip to a pager. > > alias ip='ip -color -color'
no. Don't impact existing users. > > Another alternative may be to introduce -autocolor flag. Establishing > the same syntax as used by 'ls' is not as trivial due to the simple > commandline parsing used in 'ip'. I disagree with ignoring or overriding an argument a user passes in. You are guessing what is the correct output and you are guessing wrong. There is nothing wrong with piping output to a file and the viewing that file through 'less -R'. If a user does not want the color codes in the file, then that user can drop the -color arg. iproute2 commands should not be guessing.