Tejun Heo <[email protected]> [Mon, 2018-08-13 07:47 -0700]:
> Hello, Andrey.
Hey Tejun!
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 10:35:23PM -0700, Andrey Ignatov wrote:
> > +static inline struct cgroup *cgroup_ancestor(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> > + int ancestor_level)
> > +{
> > + struct cgroup *ptr;
> > +
> > + if (cgrp->level < ancestor_level)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + for (ptr = cgrp;
> > + ptr && ptr->level > ancestor_level;
> > + ptr = cgroup_parent(ptr))
> > + ;
> > +
> > + if (ptr && ptr->level == ancestor_level)
> > + return ptr;
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
>
> I don't have any objections functionanlity-wise but can we do sth like
> the following instead?
>
> static inline struct cgroup *cgroup_ancestor(struct cgroup *cgrp,
> int ancestor_level)
> {
> if (cgrp->level < ancestor_level)
> return NULL;
>
> while (cgrp->level > ancestor_level)
> cgrp = cgroup_parent(cgrp);
> return cgrp;
> }
Sure, no problem. I'll send follow-up patch to simplify this part when
bpf-next is open again.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
--
Andrey Ignatov
