On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 03:30:41PM +0300, Vlad Buslov wrote:
> On Wed 08 Aug 2018 at 01:37, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> <marcelo.leit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 09:54:24AM +0300, Vlad Buslov wrote:
> >> Extend rate estimator 'new' and 'replace' APIs with additional spinlock
> >> parameter to be used by rtnl-unlocked actions to protect rate_est pointer
> >> from concurrent modification.
> >
> > I'm wondering if this additional parameter is really needed. So far,
> > the only case in which it is not NULL, the same lock that is used to
> > protect the stats is also used in this new parameter.
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> --- a/net/sched/act_police.c
> >> +++ b/net/sched/act_police.c
> >> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int tcf_act_police_init(struct net *net, struct
> >> nlattr *nla,
> >>
> >> if (est) {
> >> err = gen_replace_estimator(&police->tcf_bstats, NULL,
> >> - &police->tcf_rate_est,
> >> + &police->tcf_rate_est, NULL,
> >> &police->tcf_lock,
> >> NULL, est);
> >
> > Which is here, and this new NULL arg is replaced by &police->tcf_lock
> > in the next patch.
> >
> > Do you foresee a case in which a different lock will be used?
>
> Not in my use-case, no.
>
> > Or maybe it is because the current one is explicitly aimed towards the
> > stats?
>
> Yes, stats lock is only taken when fetching counters. You think better
> approach would be to rely on the fact that, in case of police action,
> same lock is already passed as stats lock? Having it as standalone
And the fact that we have no foreseeable user of two different locks.
> argument looked like cleaner approach to me. If you think this change is
> too much code for very little benefit, I can reuse stats lock.
That's my current thinking, yes. Especially considering the amount of
parameters this function already has, I would refrain from adding yet
another unless really needed.
Maybe s/stats_lock/lock/ in function parameter (struct member doesn't
need to be changed) and doctext:
* @lock: lock for statistics and control path.
wdyt?
>
> >
> > Marcelo
>
> Thank you for reviewing my code!
