Am 07.08.2018 um 19:32 schrieb Ben Whitten:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/lora/sx1301.c b/drivers/net/lora/sx1301.c
> index 5342b61..49958f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/lora/sx1301.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/lora/sx1301.c
[...]
> @@ -76,8 +287,29 @@ struct sx1301_priv {
>       struct gpio_desc *rst_gpio;
>       u8 cur_page;
>       struct spi_controller *radio_a_ctrl, *radio_b_ctrl;
> +     struct regmap           *regmap;
> +     struct regmap_field     *regmap_fields[ARRAY_SIZE(sx1301_reg_fields)];
>  };
>  
> +static int sx1301_field_read(struct sx1301_priv *priv,
> +             enum sx1301_fields field_id)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +     int val;
> +
> +     ret = regmap_field_read(priv->regmap_fields[field_id], &val);
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     return val;

This strikes me as a bad idea. Please keep returning the value by
pointer, so that we can clearly distinguish from error values.

> +}
> +
> +static int sx1301_field_write(struct sx1301_priv *priv,
> +             enum sx1301_fields field_id, u8 val)
> +{
> +     return regmap_field_write(priv->regmap_fields[field_id], val);
> +}
> +
>  static int sx1301_read_burst(struct spi_device *spi, u8 reg, u8 *val, size_t 
> len)
>  {
>       u8 addr = reg & 0x7f;
[snip]

It looks to me as if both of those static functions are unused in this
patch? Please keep things bisectable.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Reply via email to