Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next] bpf: per-register parent pointers

[Edward Cree]

On 18/07/18 04:54, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> I'd like to apply it, but I see the difference in insn_processed.
> Several cilium tests show favorable difference towards new liveness approach.
> selftests/bpf/test_xdp_noinline.o also shows the difference.
> I'm struggling to see why this patch would make such difference.
> Could you please help me analyze why such difference exists?
I'm also confused by it at present, but I am looking into it.
-Ed