On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 06:30:54PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 06:14:04PM CEST, pa...@netfilter.org wrote: > >One of the recurring complaints is that we do not have, as a driver > >writer, a central location from which we would be fed offloading rules > >into a NIC. This was brought up again during Netconf'18 in Boston. > > > >This patch just renames ndo_setup_tc to ndo_setup_offload as a very > >early initial work to prepare for follow up patches that discuss/propose > >unified flow representation for the existing offload programming APIs: > >ethtool_rxnfc, cls_flower, cls_u32 and (probably, not yet upstream) > >conntrack. > > > >Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pa...@netfilter.org> > > Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> > > It would make sense to also rename following enum: > enum tc_setup_type { > TC_SETUP_QDISC_MQPRIO, > TC_SETUP_CLSU32, > TC_SETUP_CLSFLOWER, > TC_SETUP_CLSMATCHALL, > TC_SETUP_CLSBPF, > TC_SETUP_BLOCK, > TC_SETUP_QDISC_CBS, > TC_SETUP_QDISC_RED, > TC_SETUP_QDISC_PRIO, > TC_SETUP_QDISC_MQ, > TC_SETUP_QDISC_ETF, > }; > > Maybe "enum setup_offload_type" and "SETUP_OFFLOAD_TC_*"? > > Could you please do it in a follow-up?
Yes sure, I will do asap. Thanks Jiri.