On 07/07/2018 06:11 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Lorenzo Colitti <lore...@google.com> > Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 16:31:40 +0900 > >> Tested: passes Android sock_diag_test.py, which exercises this codepath > > If this Android test case exercises this path, why didn't it trigger > the double free and thus cause this bug to be found much sooner? > > Just curious. > Presumably android has not backported yet the refcount_t stuff in their kernels. That is a guess though...
- [PATCH net] net: diag: Don't double-free TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV ... Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [PATCH net] net: diag: Don't double-free TCP_NEW_... David Miller
- Re: [PATCH net] net: diag: Don't double-free TCP_... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH net] net: diag: Don't double-free ... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH net] net: diag: Don't double-free ... Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [PATCH net] net: diag: Don't double-f... David Ahern
- Re: [PATCH net] net: diag: Don't dou... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH net] net: diag: Don't... David Ahern
- Re: [PATCH net] net: diag: D... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH net] net: diag: Don't double-free TCP_... David Ahern
- Re: [PATCH net] net: diag: Don't double-free ... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH net] net: diag: Don't double-f... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [PATCH net] net: diag: Don't dou... David Ahern