On 06/21/2018 06:08 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On 06/20/2018 08:46 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
>> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 17:24:09 -0700
>>
>>> After commit 9facc336876f ("bpf: reject any prog that failed read-only
>>> lock")
>>> offsetof(struct bpf_binary_header, image) became 3 instead of 4,
>>> breaking powerpc BPF badly, since instructions need to be word aligned.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 9facc336876f ("bpf: reject any prog that failed read-only lock")
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
>>
>> I'll apply this directly, thanks Eric.
>
> Thanks David :)
Sigh, sorry for the breakage, looks like I got fooled by x86 gcc.
struct bpf_binary_header {
u16 pages; /* 0 2 */
u16 locked:1; /* 2:15 2 */
/* XXX 15 bits hole, try to pack */
u8 image[0]; /* 4 0 */
/* size: 4, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
/* bit holes: 1, sum bit holes: 15 bits */
/* last cacheline: 4 bytes */
};
Thanks Eric!
