On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 09:53:49AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Li RongQing <lirongq...@baidu.com> wrote: > > The default NR_CPUS can be very large, but actual possible nr_cpu_ids > > usually is very small. For some x86 distribution, the NR_CPUS is 8192 > > and nr_cpu_ids is 4, so replace NR_CPU to save some memory > > Steffen, > > I will soon submit a patch to remove the percpu cache; removal > improved performance for at least one user (and by quite a sizeable > amount). > > Would you consider such removal for ipsec or ipsec-next?
I think this removel would better fit to ipsec-next. > If -next, consider applying this patch for ipsec.git. > > Otherwise consider not applying this, as the code will go away soon. This patch more an optimization than a fix, so I considered to apply it to ipsec-next. If you plan to remove it, I'll wait for that.
