From: Neil Horman <nhor...@tuxdriver.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 20:46:43 -0400
> Do you have any performance numbers to compare with and without this > patch? Adding a function like this implies that any fixes that go > into skb_gro_receive now need to be evaluated for this function too, > which means theres an implied overhead in maintaining it. If we're > signing up for that, I'd like to know that theres a significant > performance benefit. Neil, I asked Xin and Marcelo to do this. There is no reason for GSO code to use a GRO helper. And this is, in particular, blocking some skb_gro_receive() surgery I plan to perform.
