Hi Subash,

2018-06-09 19:55 GMT+02:00 Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
<subas...@codeaurora.org>:
>> thanks, I will test it on Monday.
>>
>> Just a question for my knowledge: is the new sysfs attribute really
>> needed? I mean, is there not any other way to understand from qmi_wwan
>> without user intervention that there is the rmnet device attached?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Daniele
>>
>
> Hi Daniele
>
> You can check for the rx_handler attached to qmi_wwan dev and see if it
> belongs to rmnet. You can use the attached patch for it but it think the
> sysfs way might be a bit cleaner.
>

both patches work properly for me.

Maybe it could be helpful in the first patch to add a print when
pass-through setting fails if raw-ip has not been set, just to let the
user know what is happening.

Thanks,
Daniele

>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to