Hi,

On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 01:53:39PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexander Aring <ar...@mojatatu.com>
> Date: Tue,  5 Jun 2018 18:04:04 -0400
> 
> > This patch adds care about tailroom length for allocate a skb from ipv6
> > level stack. In case of 6lowpan we had the problem the skb runs into a
> > skb_over_panic() in some special length cases. The root was there was no
> > tailroom allocated for the IEEE 802.15.4 checksum, although we had
> > the necessary tailroom specified inside the netdev structure.
> > 
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195059
> > Reported-by: David Palma <david.pa...@ntnu.no>
> > Reported-by: Rabi Narayan Sahoo <rabinarayans0...@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <ar...@mojatatu.com>
> 
> needed_tailroom is an optimization to avoid SKB reallocations
> and adjustments, it is not a guarantee.
> 

okay, then you want to have this patch for net-next? As an optimization?

Of course, when it's open again.

> If you are seeing crashes, it means code is assuming something which
> is not to be assumed.
> 
> Whatever code is involved, it needs to check that the necessary
> tailroom is there and reallocate if necessary, rather than
> blindly pushing past the end of the SKB data.
> 

I see, I will add checks and reallocs (if necessary) in the underlaying
subsystem level.

Thanks for clarifying this.

- Alex

Reply via email to