From: Yi-Hung Wei <yihung....@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 17:56:41 -0700

> Currently, nf_conntrack_max is used to limit the maximum number of
> conntrack entries in the conntrack table for every network namespace.
> For the VMs and containers that reside in the same namespace,
> they share the same conntrack table, and the total # of conntrack entries
> for all the VMs and containers are limited by nf_conntrack_max.  In this
> case, if one of the VM/container abuses the usage the conntrack entries,
> it blocks the others from committing valid conntrack entries into the
> conntrack table.  Even if we can possibly put the VM in different network
> namespace, the current nf_conntrack_max configuration is kind of rigid
> that we cannot limit different VM/container to have different # conntrack
> entries.
> 
> To address the aforementioned issue, this patch proposes to have a
> fine-grained mechanism that could further limit the # of conntrack entries
> per-zone.  For example, we can designate different zone to different VM,
> and set conntrack limit to each zone.  By providing this isolation, a
> mis-behaved VM only consumes the conntrack entries in its own zone, and
> it will not influence other well-behaved VMs.  Moreover, the users can
> set various conntrack limit to different zone based on their preference.
> 
> The proposed implementation utilizes Netfilter's nf_conncount backend
> to count the number of connections in a particular zone.  If the number of
> connection is above a configured limitation, OVS will return ENOMEM to the
> userspace.  If userspace does not configure the zone limit, the limit
> defaults to zero that is no limitation, which is backward compatible to
> the behavior without this patch.
> 
> The first patch defines the conntrack limit netlink definition, and the
> second patch provides the implementation.
 ...

Series applied, thanks for sticking with it so long and responding to the
feedback you received.

Reply via email to