On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:41:14PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> [ +Martin ]
>
> On 05/21/2018 08:59 AM, Sirio Balmelli wrote:
> > On arm32, 'cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf && make' fails with:
> >
> > libbpf.c:80:10: error: format ‘%ld’ expects argument of type ‘long int’,
> > but argument 4 has type ‘int64_t {aka long long int}’ [-Werror=format=]
> > (func)("libbpf: " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> > ^
> > libbpf.c:83:30: note: in expansion of macro ‘__pr’
> > #define pr_warning(fmt, ...) __pr(__pr_warning, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > ^~~~
> > libbpf.c:1072:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘pr_warning’
> > pr_warning("map:%s value_type:%s has BTF type_size:%ld !=
> > value_size:%u\n",
> >
> > To fix, include 'inttypes.h' and change format directive to 'PRIi64'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sirio Balmelli <si...@b-ad.ch>
>
> Thanks for the fix! One minor comment below.
>
> > ---
> > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > index 3dbe217bf23e..e2cc8f10c188 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> > @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
> > #include "bpf.h"
> > #include "btf.h"
> >
> > +#include <inttypes.h> /* PRIi64 */
> > +
> > #ifndef EM_BPF
> > #define EM_BPF 247
> > #endif
> > @@ -1042,7 +1044,7 @@ static int bpf_map_find_btf_info(struct bpf_map *map,
> > const struct btf *btf)
> > }
> >
> > if (def->key_size != key_size) {
> > - pr_warning("map:%s key_type:%s has BTF type_size:%ld !=
> > key_size:%u\n",
> > + pr_warning("map:%s key_type:%s has BTF type_size:%"PRIi64" !=
> > key_size:%u\n",
> > map->name, name, key_size, def->key_size);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > @@ -1069,7 +1071,7 @@ static int bpf_map_find_btf_info(struct bpf_map *map,
> > const struct btf *btf)
> > }
> >
> > if (def->value_size != value_size) {
> > - pr_warning("map:%s value_type:%s has BTF type_size:%ld !=
> > value_size:%u\n",
> > + pr_warning("map:%s value_type:%s has BTF type_size:%"PRIi64" !=
> > value_size:%u\n",
> > map->name, name, value_size, def->value_size);
>
> I don't think we need the PRIi64 in here. Could you just change it to
> 'type_size:%u'
> and then cast the 'key_size' resp. 'value_size' to unsigned int? We know at
> this
> point that the type size value is positive anyway, so we only want to show
> the size
> mismatch so simple cast should suffice. Thanks!
Good point. 'unsigned int' is enough because the t->size (returned
by btf_type_size()) is a u32.
>
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
>
