On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.ker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Willem de Bruijn
> <willemdebruijn.ker...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 6:26 PM, Amritha Nambiar
>>> <amritha.namb...@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> This patch adds support to pick Tx queue based on the Rx queue map
>>>> configuration set by the admin through the sysfs attribute
>>>> for each Tx queue. If the user configuration for receive
>>>> queue map does not apply, then the Tx queue selection falls back
>>>> to CPU map based selection and finally to hashing.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Amritha Nambiar <amritha.namb...@intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudr...@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>
>>>> +static int get_xps_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>>> +{
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XPS
>>>> + enum xps_map_type i = XPS_MAP_RXQS;
>>>> + struct xps_dev_maps *dev_maps;
>>>> + struct sock *sk = skb->sk;
>>>> + int queue_index = -1;
>>>> + unsigned int tci = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (sk && sk->sk_rx_queue_mapping <= dev->real_num_rx_queues &&
>>>> + dev->ifindex == sk->sk_rx_ifindex)
>>>> + tci = sk->sk_rx_queue_mapping;
>>>> +
>>>> + rcu_read_lock();
>>>> + while (queue_index < 0 && i < __XPS_MAP_MAX) {
>>>> + if (i == XPS_MAP_CPUS)
>>>
>>> This while loop typifies exactly why I don't think the XPS maps should
>>> be an array.
>>
>> +1
>
> as a matter of fact, as enabling both cpu and rxqueue map at the same
> time makes no sense, only one map is needed at any one time. The
> only difference is in how it is indexed. It should probably not be possible
> to configure both at the same time. Keeping a single map probably also
> significantly simplifies patch 1/4.
Willem,
I think it might makes sense to have them both. Maybe one application
is spin polling that needs this, where others might be happy with
normal CPU mappings as default.
Tom
