On 05/18/2018 08:42 AM, David Miller wrote:
> This looks great, series applied, thanks Eric. > > So now we handle locally terminated traffic well, however we still need > something that handles traffic flowing through the system. And for that > reason the CAKE ACK filter still has merit. > > I completely agree with you that it has to be implemented properly, > parse all TCP options and the SACK blocks, and pass the ACKs through > when there are options it doesn't understand or the SACK/timestampe/etc. > update contains new information that must be passed along and not dropper. > > Thanks again. > Be assured I will carefully review Cake ACK filter ;) Thanks David !
