On 05/17/2018 06:09 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> Add check that egress MTU can handle packet to be forwarded. If
> the MTU is less than the packet lenght, return 0 meaning the
> packet is expected to continue up the stack for help - eg.,
> fragmenting the packet or sending an ICMP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/core/filter.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 6d0d1560bd70..c47c47a75d4b 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -4098,6 +4098,7 @@ static int bpf_ipv4_fib_lookup(struct net *net, struct 
> bpf_fib_lookup *params,
>       struct fib_nh *nh;
>       struct flowi4 fl4;
>       int err;
> +     u32 mtu;
>  
>       dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, params->ifindex);
>       if (unlikely(!dev))
> @@ -4149,6 +4150,10 @@ static int bpf_ipv4_fib_lookup(struct net *net, struct 
> bpf_fib_lookup *params,
>       if (res.fi->fib_nhs > 1)
>               fib_select_path(net, &res, &fl4, NULL);
>  
> +     mtu = ip_mtu_from_fib_result(&res, params->ipv4_dst);
> +     if (params->tot_len > mtu)
> +             return 0;
> +
>       nh = &res.fi->fib_nh[res.nh_sel];
>  
>       /* do not handle lwt encaps right now */
> @@ -4188,6 +4193,7 @@ static int bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup(struct net *net, struct 
> bpf_fib_lookup *params,
>       struct flowi6 fl6;
>       int strict = 0;
>       int oif;
> +     u32 mtu;
>  
>       /* link local addresses are never forwarded */
>       if (rt6_need_strict(dst) || rt6_need_strict(src))
> @@ -4250,6 +4256,10 @@ static int bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup(struct net *net, struct 
> bpf_fib_lookup *params,
>                                                      fl6.flowi6_oif, NULL,
>                                                      strict);
>  
> +     mtu = ip6_mtu_from_fib6(f6i, dst, src);
> +     if (params->tot_len > mtu)
> +             return 0;
> +
>       if (f6i->fib6_nh.nh_lwtstate)
>               return 0;

Could you elaborate how this interacts in tc BPF use case where you have e.g.
GSO packets and tot_len from aggregated packets would definitely be larger
than MTU (e.g. see is_skb_forwardable() as one example on such checks)? Should
this be an opt-in via a new flag for the helper?

Thanks,
Daniel

Reply via email to