Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:29 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <t...@toke.dk> wrote:
>> + if (tb[TCA_CAKE_AUTORATE]) {
>> + if (!!nla_get_u32(tb[TCA_CAKE_AUTORATE]))
>> + q->rate_flags |= CAKE_FLAG_AUTORATE_INGRESS;
>> + else
>> + q->rate_flags &= ~CAKE_FLAG_AUTORATE_INGRESS;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (tb[TCA_CAKE_INGRESS]) {
>> + if (!!nla_get_u32(tb[TCA_CAKE_INGRESS]))
>> + q->rate_flags |= CAKE_FLAG_INGRESS;
>> + else
>> + q->rate_flags &= ~CAKE_FLAG_INGRESS;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (tb[TCA_CAKE_MEMORY])
>> q->buffer_config_limit = nla_get_u32(tb[TCA_CAKE_MEMORY]);
>>
>> @@ -1559,6 +1628,14 @@ static int cake_dump(struct Qdisc *sch, struct
>> sk_buff *skb)
>> if (nla_put_u32(skb, TCA_CAKE_MEMORY, q->buffer_config_limit))
>> goto nla_put_failure;
>>
>> + if (nla_put_u32(skb, TCA_CAKE_AUTORATE,
>> + !!(q->rate_flags & CAKE_FLAG_AUTORATE_INGRESS)))
>> + goto nla_put_failure;
>> +
>> + if (nla_put_u32(skb, TCA_CAKE_INGRESS,
>> + !!(q->rate_flags & CAKE_FLAG_INGRESS)))
>> + goto nla_put_failure;
>> +
>
> Why do you want to dump each bit of the rate_flags separately rather than
> dumping the whole rate_flags as an integer?
Well, these were added one at a time, each as a new option. Isn't that
more or less congruent with how netlink attributes are supposed to be
used?
-Toke
