On 05/15/2018 11:09 PM, Y Song wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net>
> wrote:
>> On 05/14/2018 07:00 PM, John Fastabend wrote:
[...]
>>> enum bpf_prog_type {
>>> @@ -1855,6 +1856,52 @@ struct bpf_stack_build_id {
>>> * Egress device index on success, 0 if packet needs to
>>> continue
>>> * up the stack for further processing or a negative error in
>>> case
>>> * of failure.
>>> + * int bpf_sock_hash_update(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *skops, struct
>>> bpf_map *map, void *key, u64 flags)
>>
>> When you rebase please fix this up properly next time and add a newline in
>> between
>> the helpers. I fixed this up while applying.
>
> I guess the tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h may also need fixup to be
> in sync with main bpf.h.
Yep agree, just fixed it up, thanks!
