02 Eki 2006 Pts 13:24 tarihinde, Jarek Poplawski şunları yazmıştı: 
> On 30-09-2006 21:23, Ismail Donmez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > With commit 10fd48f2376db52f08bf0420d2c4f580e39269e1 [1] ,  RB_EMPTY_NODE
> > changed behaviour so it returns false when the node is empty as expected.
>
> ...
>
> > -   if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(rb)) {
> > +   if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(rb)) {
>
> Maybe you have some kind of agreement with Jens Axboe but I
> can't understand current way of kernel cooperation:
> he changes some global behavior to the opposite and fixes
> his code in three places but can't fix it in the fourth place
> where it's used? Isn't it both trivial and automatic kind
> of patch?

I don't know if Jens will going to fix other occurrences but the sch_htb.c fix 
was recent and Jens'  commit got my attention hence the patch.

Regards,
ismail

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to