On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:02:08AM -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 09:31:27AM -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > > > > cap net admin is not high enough privledge to see unhashed kernel > > > > pointers. CAP_RAW_IO? Or follow what printk does? > > > > > > > > > > Do you mean CAP_NET_RAW? Here's the comments for it: > > > > Nope.. > > > > > Func restricted_pointer() from lib/vsprintf.c uses CAP_SYSLOG. The > > comment for CAP_SYSLOG: > > > > Yikes, yes, that is probably the required logic here, including the > > kptr_restrict = 0 thing > > > > Let's defer the ktpr_restrict issue for now; I want to finish the initial > work this cycle, and adding that will likely take too much time. I'll use > CAP_SYSLOG and add a FIXME comment. Ok?
Lets just drop wr_id instead... Jason
