On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 02:07:02PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
> Teach the verifier a little bit about a new type of pointer, a
> PTR_TO_SOCKET. This pointer type is accessed from BPF through the
> 'struct bpf_sock' structure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <j...@wand.net.nz>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h          | 19 +++++++++-
>  include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  2 ++
>  kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 86 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  net/core/filter.c            | 30 +++++++++-------
>  4 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Ack for patches 1-3. In this one few nits:

> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index a38e474bf7ee..a03b4b0edcb6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ enum bpf_arg_type {
>       /* the following constraints used to prototype bpf_memcmp() and other
>        * functions that access data on eBPF program stack
>        */
> -     ARG_PTR_TO_MEM,         /* pointer to valid memory (stack, packet, map 
> value) */
> +     ARG_PTR_TO_MEM,         /* pointer to valid memory (stack, packet, map 
> value, socket) */

I don't see where in this patch this change happens...

>       ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL, /* pointer to valid memory or NULL */
>       ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM,  /* pointer to memory does not need to be 
> initialized,
>                                * helper function must fill all bytes or clear
> @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ enum bpf_arg_type {
>  
>       ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,         /* pointer to context */
>       ARG_ANYTHING,           /* any (initialized) argument is ok */
> +     ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET,      /* pointer to bpf_sock */
>  };
>  
>  /* type of values returned from helper functions */
> @@ -155,6 +156,7 @@ enum bpf_return_type {
>       RET_INTEGER,                    /* function returns integer */
>       RET_VOID,                       /* function doesn't return anything */
>       RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL,   /* returns a pointer to map elem value 
> or NULL */
> +     RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL,      /* returns a pointer to a socket or 
> NULL */
>  };
>  
>  /* eBPF function prototype used by verifier to allow BPF_CALLs from eBPF 
> programs
> @@ -205,6 +207,8 @@ enum bpf_reg_type {
>       PTR_TO_PACKET_META,      /* skb->data - meta_len */
>       PTR_TO_PACKET,           /* reg points to skb->data */
>       PTR_TO_PACKET_END,       /* skb->data + headlen */
> +     PTR_TO_SOCKET,           /* reg points to struct bpf_sock */
> +     PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL,   /* reg points to struct bpf_sock or NULL */
>  };
>  
>  /* The information passed from prog-specific *_is_valid_access
> @@ -326,6 +330,11 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto 
> *bpf_get_trace_printk_proto(void);
>  
>  typedef unsigned long (*bpf_ctx_copy_t)(void *dst, const void *src,
>                                       unsigned long off, unsigned long len);
> +typedef u32 (*bpf_convert_ctx_access_t)(enum bpf_access_type type,
> +                                     const struct bpf_insn *src,
> +                                     struct bpf_insn *dst,
> +                                     struct bpf_prog *prog,
> +                                     u32 *target_size);
>  
>  u64 bpf_event_output(struct bpf_map *map, u64 flags, void *meta, u64 
> meta_size,
>                    void *ctx, u64 ctx_size, bpf_ctx_copy_t ctx_copy);
> @@ -729,4 +738,12 @@ extern const struct bpf_func_proto 
> bpf_sock_map_update_proto;
>  void bpf_user_rnd_init_once(void);
>  u64 bpf_user_rnd_u32(u64 r1, u64 r2, u64 r3, u64 r4, u64 r5);
>  
> +bool bpf_sock_is_valid_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
> +                           struct bpf_insn_access_aux *info);
> +u32 bpf_sock_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
> +                             const struct bpf_insn *si,
> +                             struct bpf_insn *insn_buf,
> +                             struct bpf_prog *prog,
> +                             u32 *target_size);
> +
>  #endif /* _LINUX_BPF_H */
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> index a613b52ce939..9dcd87f1d322 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ struct bpf_reg_state {
>        * offset, so they can share range knowledge.
>        * For PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL this is used to share which map value we
>        * came from, when one is tested for != NULL.
> +      * For PTR_TO_SOCKET this is used to share which pointers retain the
> +      * same reference to the socket, to determine proper reference freeing.
>        */
>       u32 id;
>       /* Ordering of fields matters.  See states_equal() */
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 1b31b805dea4..d38c7c1e9da6 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ static const struct bpf_verifier_ops * const 
> bpf_verifier_ops[] = {
>   * (like pointer plus pointer becomes SCALAR_VALUE type)
>   *
>   * When verifier sees load or store instructions the type of base register
> - * can be: PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_STACK. These are three 
> pointer
> - * types recognized by check_mem_access() function.
> + * can be: PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_STACK, PTR_TO_SOCKET. These 
> are
> + * four pointer types recognized by check_mem_access() function.
>   *
>   * PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE means that this register is pointing to 'map element 
> value'
>   * and the range of [ptr, ptr + map's value_size) is accessible.
> @@ -244,6 +244,8 @@ static const char * const reg_type_str[] = {
>       [PTR_TO_PACKET]         = "pkt",
>       [PTR_TO_PACKET_META]    = "pkt_meta",
>       [PTR_TO_PACKET_END]     = "pkt_end",
> +     [PTR_TO_SOCKET]         = "sock",
> +     [PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL] = "sock_or_null",
>  };
>  
>  static void print_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> @@ -977,6 +979,8 @@ static bool is_spillable_regtype(enum bpf_reg_type type)
>       case PTR_TO_PACKET_META:
>       case PTR_TO_PACKET_END:
>       case CONST_PTR_TO_MAP:
> +     case PTR_TO_SOCKET:
> +     case PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL:
>               return true;
>       default:
>               return false;
> @@ -1360,6 +1364,28 @@ static int check_ctx_access(struct bpf_verifier_env 
> *env, int insn_idx, int off,
>       return -EACCES;
>  }
>  
> +static int check_sock_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int 
> off,
> +                          int size, enum bpf_access_type t)
> +{
> +     struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env);
> +     struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &regs[regno];
> +     struct bpf_insn_access_aux info;
> +
> +     if (reg->smin_value < 0) {
> +             verbose(env, "R%d min value is negative, either use unsigned 
> index or do a if (index >=0) check.\n",
> +                     regno);
> +             return -EACCES;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (!bpf_sock_is_valid_access(off, size, t, &info)) {
> +             verbose(env, "invalid bpf_sock_ops access off=%d size=%d\n",
> +                     off, size);
> +             return -EACCES;
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks,
>                              const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
>  {
> @@ -1475,6 +1501,9 @@ static int check_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env 
> *env,
>                */
>               strict = true;
>               break;
> +     case PTR_TO_SOCKET:
> +             pointer_desc = "sock ";
> +             break;
>       default:
>               break;
>       }
> @@ -1723,6 +1752,16 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env 
> *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
>               err = check_packet_access(env, regno, off, size, false);
>               if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)
>                       mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno);
> +
> +     } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_SOCKET) {
> +             if (t == BPF_WRITE) {
> +                     verbose(env, "cannot write into socket\n");
> +                     return -EACCES;
> +             }
> +             err = check_sock_access(env, regno, off, size, t);
> +             if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0)

t == BPF_READ check is unnecessary.

> +                     mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno);
> +
>       } else {
>               verbose(env, "R%d invalid mem access '%s'\n", regno,
>                       reg_type_str[reg->type]);
> @@ -1941,6 +1980,10 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env 
> *env, u32 regno,
>               expected_type = PTR_TO_CTX;
>               if (type != expected_type)
>                       goto err_type;
> +     } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET) {
> +             expected_type = PTR_TO_SOCKET;
> +             if (type != expected_type)
> +                     goto err_type;
>       } else if (arg_type_is_mem_ptr(arg_type)) {
>               expected_type = PTR_TO_STACK;
>               /* One exception here. In case function allows for NULL to be
> @@ -2477,6 +2520,10 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env 
> *env, int func_id, int insn
>                       insn_aux->map_ptr = meta.map_ptr;
>               else if (insn_aux->map_ptr != meta.map_ptr)
>                       insn_aux->map_ptr = BPF_MAP_PTR_POISON;
> +     } else if (fn->ret_type == RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL) {
> +             mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
> +             regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL;
> +             regs[BPF_REG_0].id = ++env->id_gen;
>       } else {
>               verbose(env, "unknown return type %d of func %s#%d\n",
>                       fn->ret_type, func_id_name(func_id), func_id);
> @@ -2614,6 +2661,8 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct 
> bpf_verifier_env *env,
>               return -EACCES;
>       case CONST_PTR_TO_MAP:
>       case PTR_TO_PACKET_END:
> +     case PTR_TO_SOCKET:
> +     case PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL:
>               verbose(env, "R%d pointer arithmetic on %s prohibited\n",
>                       dst, reg_type_str[ptr_reg->type]);
>               return -EACCES;
> @@ -3559,6 +3608,8 @@ static void mark_ptr_or_null_reg(struct bpf_reg_state 
> *reg, u32 id,
>                       } else {
>                               reg->type = PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE;
>                       }
> +             } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL) {
> +                     reg->type = PTR_TO_SOCKET;
>               }
>               /* We don't need id from this point onwards anymore, thus we
>                * should better reset it, so that state pruning has chances
> @@ -4333,6 +4384,8 @@ static bool regsafe(struct bpf_reg_state *rold, struct 
> bpf_reg_state *rcur,
>       case PTR_TO_CTX:
>       case CONST_PTR_TO_MAP:
>       case PTR_TO_PACKET_END:
> +     case PTR_TO_SOCKET:
> +     case PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL:
>               /* Only valid matches are exact, which memcmp() above
>                * would have accepted
>                */
> @@ -5188,10 +5241,14 @@ static void sanitize_dead_code(struct 
> bpf_verifier_env *env)
>       }
>  }
>  
> -/* convert load instructions that access fields of 'struct __sk_buff'
> - * into sequence of instructions that access fields of 'struct sk_buff'
> +/* convert load instructions that access fields of a context type into a
> + * sequence of instructions that access fields of the underlying structure:
> + *     struct __sk_buff    -> struct sk_buff
> + *     struct bpf_sock_ops -> struct sock
>   */
> -static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
> +static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> +                             bpf_convert_ctx_access_t convert_ctx_access,
> +                             enum bpf_reg_type ctx_type)
>  {
>       const struct bpf_verifier_ops *ops = env->ops;
>       int i, cnt, size, ctx_field_size, delta = 0;
> @@ -5218,12 +5275,14 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct 
> bpf_verifier_env *env)
>               }
>       }
>  
> -     if (!ops->convert_ctx_access || bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(env->prog->aux))
> +     if (!convert_ctx_access || bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(env->prog->aux))
>               return 0;
>  
>       insn = env->prog->insnsi + delta;
>  
>       for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
> +             enum bpf_reg_type ptr_type;
> +
>               if (insn->code == (BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B) ||
>                   insn->code == (BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H) ||
>                   insn->code == (BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W) ||
> @@ -5237,7 +5296,8 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env 
> *env)
>               else
>                       continue;
>  
> -             if (env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ptr_type != PTR_TO_CTX)
> +             ptr_type = env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ptr_type;
> +             if (ptr_type != ctx_type)
>                       continue;
>  
>               ctx_field_size = env->insn_aux_data[i + delta].ctx_field_size;
> @@ -5269,8 +5329,8 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env 
> *env)
>               }
>  
>               target_size = 0;
> -             cnt = ops->convert_ctx_access(type, insn, insn_buf, env->prog,
> -                                           &target_size);
> +             cnt = convert_ctx_access(type, insn, insn_buf, env->prog,
> +                                      &target_size);
>               if (cnt == 0 || cnt >= ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf) ||
>                   (ctx_field_size && !target_size)) {
>                       verbose(env, "bpf verifier is misconfigured\n");
> @@ -5785,7 +5845,13 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr 
> *attr)
>  
>       if (ret == 0)
>               /* program is valid, convert *(u32*)(ctx + off) accesses */
> -             ret = convert_ctx_accesses(env);
> +             ret = convert_ctx_accesses(env, env->ops->convert_ctx_access,
> +                                        PTR_TO_CTX);
> +
> +     if (ret == 0)
> +             /* Convert *(u32*)(sock_ops + off) accesses */
> +             ret = convert_ctx_accesses(env, bpf_sock_convert_ctx_access,
> +                                        PTR_TO_SOCKET);

Overall looks great.
Only this part is missing for PTR_TO_SOCKET:
     } else if (dst_reg_type != *prev_dst_type &&
                (dst_reg_type == PTR_TO_CTX ||
                 *prev_dst_type == PTR_TO_CTX)) {
             verbose(env, "same insn cannot be used with different pointers\n");
             return -EINVAL;
similar logic has to be added.
Otherwise the following will be accepted:

R1 = sock_ptr
goto X;
...
R1 = some_other_valid_ptr;
goto X;
...

R2 = *(u32 *)(R1 + 0);
this will be rewritten for first branch,
but it's wrong for second.

Reply via email to