On 5/7/18 6:41 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Hi,
> On Mon, 2018-05-07 at 13:19 +0300, Damir Mansurov wrote:
>> After successful call of the setsockopt(SO_BINDTODEVICE) function to set 
>> data reception from only one interface, the data is still received from 
>> all interfaces. Function setsockopt() returns 0 but then recv() receives 
>> data from all available network interfaces.
>>
>> The problem is reproducible on linux kernels 4.14 - 4.16, but it does 
>> not on linux kernels 4.4, 4.13.
> 
> I think that the cause is commit:
> 
> commit fb74c27735f0a34e76dbf1972084e984ad2ea145
> Author: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com>
> Date:   Mon Aug 7 08:44:16 2017 -0700
> 
>     net: ipv4: add second dif to udp socket lookups
> 
> Something like the following should fix, but I'm unsure it preserves
> the intended semathics for 'sdif'. David, can you please have a look?
> Thanks!
> 
> Paolo
> ---
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index dd3102a37ef9..0d593d5c33cf 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -401,9 +401,9 @@ static int compute_score(struct sock *sk, struct net *net,
>               bool dev_match = (sk->sk_bound_dev_if == dif ||
>                                 sk->sk_bound_dev_if == sdif);
>  
> -             if (exact_dif && !dev_match)
> +             if (!dev_match)
>                       return -1;
> -             if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if && dev_match)
> +             if (sk->sk_bound_dev_if)
>                       score += 4;
>       }
>  
> 

The above fixes the reported problem. You should make the same change to
ipv6 as well. Fixes tags:

Fixes: fb74c27735f0a ("net: ipv4: add second dif to udp socket lookups")
Fixes: 1801b570dd2ae ("net: ipv6: add second dif to udp socket lookups")


The change does break a VRF use case, but that case works by accident
given this bug. The use case is a client or server bound to an enslaved
device and trying to communicate locally. In some cases the error is the
ICMP 'Connection refused' getting lost; in other cases the packets don't
make it from one scope to another (eg., VRF based server talking to
device based client). After poking around for a couple of days, I
believe the proper fix for this uses case is beyond the scope of
anything that should be backported to 4.14. So I am fine with the
breakage to what is IMHO a corner case - and there is a reasonable
workaround until I find a proper solution.


Reply via email to