Wed, May 02, 2018 at 07:51:12PM CEST, sridhar.samudr...@intel.com wrote:
>
>
>On 5/2/2018 9:15 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:06:01AM CEST, j...@resnulli.us wrote:
>> > Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 07:06:58PM CEST, sridhar.samudr...@intel.com wrote:
>> [...]
>> 
>> 
>> > > +
>> > > +        err = netdev_rx_handler_register(slave_dev, 
>> > > net_failover_handle_frame,
>> > > +                                         failover_dev);
>> > > +        if (err) {
>> > > +                netdev_err(slave_dev, "can not register failover rx 
>> > > handler (err = %d)\n",
>> > > +                           err);
>> > > +                goto err_handler_register;
>> > > +        }
>> > > +
>> > > +        err = netdev_upper_dev_link(slave_dev, failover_dev, NULL);
>> > Please use netdev_master_upper_dev_link().
>> Don't forget to fillup struct netdev_lag_upper_info - 
>> NETDEV_LAG_TX_TYPE_ACTIVEBACKUP
>> 
>> 
>> Also, please call netdev_lower_state_changed() when the active slave
>> device changes from primary->backup of backup->primary and whenever link
>> state of a slave changes
>> 
>Sure. will look into it.  Do you think this will help with the issue
>you saw with having to change mac on standy twice to get the init scripts
>working? We are now going to block changing the mac on both standby and
>failover.
>
>Also, i was wondering if we should set dev->flags to IFF_MASTER on failover
>and IFF_SLAVE on primary and standby. netvsc does this.

No. Don't set it. It is wrong.



>Does this help with the init scripts and network manager to skip slave
>devices for dhcp requests?
>

Reply via email to