Greetings all, On 23/09/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just i was pondering why we got different results and try to see if we can come to some understanding on this different results we got. Who knows we together might run into some fundamental research issues regarding testing.
Since many interested parties will be around LA for PFLDnet, how about getting together after that (Friday 9 Feb) to re-run some of the disputed tests on one set of hardware, with everyone present to debate the results? You're all welcome to come to Caltech to do the testing. We can provide a few servers, dummynets and Gigabit switches. Everyone is welcome to bring their scripts, and any other hardware they need. If there is interest, we could also have things like a round-table discussion of the benefits of testing with different file-length distributions (like long lived flows to understand what is happening vs a range of flows to test suitability for deployment), and the benefits of repeating other people's tests vs testing in as many scenarios as possible. Who is interested in coming? Cheers, Lachlan -- Lachlan Andrew Dept of Computer Science, Caltech 1200 E California Blvd, Mail Code 256-80, Pasadena CA 91125, USA Phone: +1 (626) 395-8820 Fax: +1 (626) 568-3603 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
