On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 03:52:13PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 14:21:16 +0100 > Daniel Thompson <daniel.thomp...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 02:10:04PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:34:02 +0800 Leo Yan <leo....@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Fix typo by replacing 'iif' with 'if'. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo....@linaro.org> > > > > --- > > > > samples/bpf/bpf_load.c | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c b/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c > > > > index bebe418..28e4678 100644 > > > > --- a/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c > > > > +++ b/samples/bpf/bpf_load.c > > > > @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static int load_elf_maps_section(struct > > > > bpf_map_data *maps, int maps_shndx, > > > > continue; > > > > if (sym[nr_maps].st_shndx != maps_shndx) > > > > continue; > > > > - /* Only increment iif maps section */ > > > > + /* Only increment if maps section */ > > > > nr_maps++; > > > > } > > > > > > This was actually not a typo from my side. > > > > > > With 'iif' I mean 'if and only if' ... but it doesn't matter much. > > > > I think 'if and only if' is more commonly abbreviated 'iff' isn't it? > > Ah, yes![1] -- then it *is* actually a typo! - LOL > > I'm fine with changing this to "if" :-)
Thanks for the reviewing, Daniel & Jesper. I also learn it from the discussion :) > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_and_only_if > > -- > Best regards, > Jesper Dangaard Brouer > MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
